Explore the website

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss a post!

* indicates required

Medicines Law & Policy will use the information you provide to keep you up-to-date when we post new research and insight. You can change your mind about receiving our newsletter any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us. We will treat your information with respect. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Explore the website

Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

US Authorisation of Non-Voluntary Use of Patents frequently used for health technologies

During the Covid-19 pandemic, the United States prioritised the rapid development of products needed to combat the health crisis.  Rapid product development was pursued through the use of a statute and implementing regulation in US law that permits the non-voluntary use of patents in dozens of US government contracts. After all, having to identify patent rights and negotiate licences would have seriously delayed the efforts to rapidly produce pandemic countermeasures. The use of the clause that enabled the non-voluntary use of U.S. patents was not specific to the Covid-19 crisis. Upon a closer examination, the clause had already been extensively incorporated in numerous US government contracts long before the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Legislative Framework

The US law, statute 28 U.S. Code § 1498, allows the US government to use or authorise third parties to use any U.S. granted patent, without permission or even notice to patent holders, so long as the use is “by or for” the government. In many cases, the implementation of 28 US Code § 1498 is facilitated through the U.S. Government’s Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR), specifically, the clause FAR 52.227-1, titled “authorization and consent,” which grants authorisation and consent to use any inventions covered by a U.S. patent.

When FAR 52.227-1 is incorporated into a contract, a company can utilise a patented invention without the obligation to specify which patent(s) they intend to use and without the obligation to even inform the patent owner of the non-voluntary use. FAR 52.227-1 can be included in US government contracts in a variety of ways. While the text of the regulation can be included in a contract, it’s more common for the contract to simply reference the inclusion of FAR 52.227-1. Typically, the clause is included by reference rather than explicitly stated. However, referencing FAR 52.227-1 carries the same legal weight and impact as if the entire clause had been fully articulated in the contract itself.

It is important to note that FAR 52.227-1 does not impose any restrictions on imports or exports, and indeed, in some cases, a product manufactured in the U.S. under a FAR 52.227-1 clause may be exclusively destined for export markets.

Database of FAR 52.227-1 Contracts

Knowledge Ecology International, a non-governmental organisation with expertise in the field of intellectual property and access to medicines has compiled a database featuring over 350 contracts. This database includes a variety of US government contracts that, whether explicitly or through reference, integrate FAR 52.227-1. The contracts within the database are divided among different executive branches of the U.S. government, including entities like the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Department of Defense (DOD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and many others. 

The contracts provided in the database are not limited to biomedical contracts and span various sectors, including agricultural, environmental services, energy, aerospace vehicles, and many others. This information is now also included in the Medicines Law & Policy TRIPS Flexibilities Database.

Unlike in other countries where decisions on non-voluntary patent use often necessitate approval from high-ranking government officials or patent offices, the US has a highly decentralised system, where tens of thousands of contracting officers have the authority to include a FAR 52.227-1 reference in a contract, to permit the non-voluntary use of patents across a wide range of contexts and industries.

Avatar photo
Website |  + posts

Arianna Schouten is Senior Researcher at KEI. Before joining KEI, Arianna was a legal assistant of European Competition Law at Stibbe, a Benelux law firm in Amsterdam. Additionally, she researched the implementation of Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property flexibilities in national law for Medicines Law & Policy.

Newsletter

Never miss a post! Sign up for ML&P's newsletter.

Recent Articles

The People vs. AbbVie

Today, 9 May 2025, is an important day in court for the Dutch Pharmaceutical Accountability Foundation (PAF). In February 2023, PAF started a court...

The Pandemic Agreement is here

In December 2021, the member states of the World Health Organization decided “to draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument...

Expanding local production is essential for pandemic preparedness. It requires, however, transfer of technology.

Madam co-chairs, delegates,  This very week, from 7 to 9 April the 3rd World Local Production Forum is taking place in Abu Dhabi. Actions towards...

Will Europe block the Pandemic Agreement because of one word?

This commentary originally appeared in the Brussels Times, and is available here. The Pandemic Agreement negotiations began in December of 2021. Sufficiently motivated by the...

“Mutually agreed terms and conditions,” says it all.

On 4 March, Politico reported that the Polish presidency of the Council of the European Union (EU) is expressing doubt that the Pandemic Agreement...

Related Articles