Ensure greater transparency and meaningful participation for a better pandemic accord


This statement was delivered by Medicines Law & Policy at the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), Session 12 (resumed), 6 December 2024

Madam co-chair (s), members of the bureau, distinguished delegates,

We have reached the last day of INB12, and while there is some new ‘greened’ text to be pleased about, it is equally important to recognise that the pandemic agreement is not a colouring book. 

Substantive provisions on difficult issues such as equity in access, transfer of technology, IP and PABS- remain absent or are, at best, weak. Experts that could have helped identify meaningful solutions were left out of the negotiation room. It also made it difficult for relevant stakeholders to offer timely and relevant inputs to the text.

Moving forward, it will be crucial to ensure greater transparency and meaningful participation of relevant stakeholders, including in the future meetings of the Conference of Parties (COP). The COP will offer the opportunity to further improve the agreement. 

In the years to come, the role of non-state actors in prevention of, preparedness for and response to pandemic and other threats to health, from which all peoples on this planet should be protected, will only become more important. Make sure they are at the table.

Medicines Law & Policy’s previous statements to INB can be found here:

All Medicines Law & Policy pandemic accord resources can be found here: https://medicineslawandpolicy.org/pandemic-accord/

Avatar photo
+ posts

Medicines Law & Policy brings together legal and policy experts in the field of access to medicines, international law, and public health. We provide policy and legal analysis, best practice models and other information that can be used by governments, non-governmental organisations, product development initiatives, funding agencies, UN agencies and others working to ensure the availability of effective, safe and affordable medicines for all.

Newsletter

Never miss a post! Sign up for ML&P's newsletter.

Recent Articles

Will Europe block the Pandemic Agreement because of one word?

This commentary originally appeared in the Brussels Times, and is available here. The Pandemic Agreement negotiations began in December of 2021. Sufficiently motivated by the...

“Mutually agreed terms and conditions,” says it all.

On 4 March, Politico reported that the Polish presidency of the Council of the European Union (EU) is expressing doubt that the Pandemic Agreement...

“This week, the medicines were not there”: What is at stake in the pandemic agreement

Earlier this week I listened to a testimony from a community worker at a maternity ward where HIV-positive women gave birth. 17 babies were...

A better way to solve a crisis: A new mechanism for incentivising R&D on new antimicrobials

Antimicrobial resistance is the ‘silent’ pandemic: Globally, it costs 5 million lives a year, and is set to rise to more than 8 million...

The world needs a signal that multilateralism works: ML&P opening statement to the INB13, 17 February 2025

Thank you for the opportunity to make a brief statement. The negotiations for the Pandemic Agreement enter the final phase. We hope and wish for...

Related Articles