Transfer of Technology: New definition and stronger language needed

Statement by Medicines Law & Policy on Article 11, Technology Transfer Intergovernmental Negotiating Body on a Pandemic Accord (INB), Session 12

Delivered at the WHO on Thursday 7 November, 2024

Thank you for the opportunity to speak. Our comments relate to Article 11, and specifically the definition of technology transfer which should be improved. We refer to our statement from Monday, and emphasise that meaningful technology transfer provisions are essential to what this agreement is meant to achieve. Access to know-how is a critical part of technology transfer, and references to it should remain in the final text. 

It might be advisable to use an existing definition of technology transfer as the basis for the new footnote 1(j) under Article 11.

The following proposed wording is based on the definition of technology transfer provided by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO):

For the purposes of this Agreement, Transfer of Technology refers to a collaborative process where technology, knowledge and intellectual property is shared with private or public actors to enable production of pandemic related health products.

Parties may have different means to regulate and incentivize technology holders to engage in meaningful and collaborative technology transfer. Article 11 par. 1 reflects this and so does Parties’ domestic laws and practices. In this context  we would like to refer to the EU’s proposed EU-wide compulsory licensing regulation which has relevant provisions to ensure access to undisclosed information and know-how when needed in a pandemic context. 

We urge member states to avoid weakening Article 11 with words like “consider” or “take measures” rather than “ensure” and adopt”; decisive action is needed to adequately prepare for and respond to pandemics and commitments to this end need to be unambiguous.  

All Medicines Law & Policy resources related to the INB are here: https://medicineslawandpolicy.org/pandemic-accord/ 

Avatar photo
+ posts

Medicines Law & Policy brings together legal and policy experts in the field of access to medicines, international law, and public health. We provide policy and legal analysis, best practice models and other information that can be used by governments, non-governmental organisations, product development initiatives, funding agencies, UN agencies and others working to ensure the availability of effective, safe and affordable medicines for all.

Newsletter

Never miss a post! Sign up for ML&P's newsletter.

Recent Articles

Will Europe block the Pandemic Agreement because of one word?

This commentary originally appeared in the Brussels Times, and is available here. The Pandemic Agreement negotiations began in December of 2021. Sufficiently motivated by the...

“Mutually agreed terms and conditions,” says it all.

On 4 March, Politico reported that the Polish presidency of the Council of the European Union (EU) is expressing doubt that the Pandemic Agreement...

“This week, the medicines were not there”: What is at stake in the pandemic agreement

Earlier this week I listened to a testimony from a community worker at a maternity ward where HIV-positive women gave birth. 17 babies were...

A better way to solve a crisis: A new mechanism for incentivising R&D on new antimicrobials

Antimicrobial resistance is the ‘silent’ pandemic: Globally, it costs 5 million lives a year, and is set to rise to more than 8 million...

The world needs a signal that multilateralism works: ML&P opening statement to the INB13, 17 February 2025

Thank you for the opportunity to make a brief statement. The negotiations for the Pandemic Agreement enter the final phase. We hope and wish for...

Related Articles