Dutch health insurance company Menzis takes AstraZeneca to court over patent evergreening

Today health insurance company Menzis announced  [this announcement has been removed. See for reporting in the media here and here.] that it is taking the pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca to court over the pricing of Seroquel, a medicine used for the treatment of psychosis. Menzis asserts that AstraZeneca abused its position in the market and maintained, unnecessarily a high price for the product through evergreening of its patents. “Large pharmaceutical companies such as AstraZeneca abuse their position and the delaying effect of patent protection in order to maintain an unnecessarily high price for medicines,” said Henk Eleveld, advising pharmacist (not practicing) at Menzis. “That is a form of ‘evergreening’, keeping medicine prices high for as long as possible. This can be done, for example, by demonstrating that the medication also helps for another condition. Then the patent can be renewed or stretched. … During that period, other manufacturers can not bring the medicine to the market at a lower price” he added. The legal action is unprecedented in the Netherlands. It has not happened before that a health insurance company took a drug company to court over a medicines pricing dispute.

Menzis is claiming 4.2 million Euro in damages on behalf of its customers. The case will be heard by the patent court in The Hague on Friday 21 September at 10 AM. This hearing is open to the public.

The issue of high drug pricing also made it into the presentation of the Dutch government’s budget this week. The Minister of health writes in ‘de Miljoenennota 2019’: “Pharmaceutical companies that sell their medicines extremely expensively must provide insight into the structure of their prices.” A strong call for greater transparency in drug pricing.

Earlier this month a 500 fold price increase of an old product, CDCA for the treatment of a rare genetic metabolic disease, by company Leadiant made headlines. The Dutch competition authorities have since been asked to look into Leadiant’s abuse by the Foundation for Pharmaceutical Accountability. In response to the upheaval on drug pricing, the Dutch pharmaceutical lobby group,  Vereniging Innovatieve Geneesmiddelen, announced plans to develop a code of conduct. But few are holding their breath.

[Post updated on 22 September 18:54 h.]

 

Avatar photo
+ posts

Ellen ‘t Hoen, LLM PhD, is a lawyer and public health advocate with over 30 years of experience working on pharmaceutical and intellectual property policies.

Newsletter

Never miss a post! Sign up for ML&P's newsletter.

Recent Articles

The Pandemic Agreement is here

In December 2021, the member states of the World Health Organization decided “to draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement or other international instrument...

Expanding local production is essential for pandemic preparedness. It requires, however, transfer of technology.

Madam co-chairs, delegates,  This very week, from 7 to 9 April the 3rd World Local Production Forum is taking place in Abu Dhabi. Actions towards...

Will Europe block the Pandemic Agreement because of one word?

This commentary originally appeared in the Brussels Times, and is available here. The Pandemic Agreement negotiations began in December of 2021. Sufficiently motivated by the...

“Mutually agreed terms and conditions,” says it all.

On 4 March, Politico reported that the Polish presidency of the Council of the European Union (EU) is expressing doubt that the Pandemic Agreement...

“This week, the medicines were not there”: What is at stake in the pandemic agreement

Earlier this week I listened to a testimony from a community worker at a maternity ward where HIV-positive women gave birth. 17 babies were...

Related Articles