Current drafts of the WHO Pandemic Accord lack a provision for access to knowhow/trade secrets. We drafted one.

Negotiations are currently taking place at the World Health Organization (WHO) to conclude a new pandemic agreement by May 2024. The objective of the new agreement is to learn from mistakes made during the Covid-19 pandemic and to be better prepared for future outbreaks. A key learning from the Covid-19 pandemic is the need to address access to intellectual property to assure timely and equitable access to pandemic countermeasures. 

An important issue that is not adequately addressed in drafts of the agreement that have so far been publicly available is the sharing of knowhow and trade secrets necessary for the production of pandemic products. Knowhow/trade secrets sharing is particularly important for more complex medical technologies that cannot be easily replicated with access to patents alone. Examples include vaccines and monoclonal antibodies. Therefore, the new WHO pandemic instrument needs to include a provision for access to knowhow/trade secrets. We have drafted a proposal for such a provision.

Avatar photo
+ posts

Medicines Law & Policy brings together legal and policy experts in the field of access to medicines, international law, and public health. We provide policy and legal analysis, best practice models and other information that can be used by governments, non-governmental organisations, product development initiatives, funding agencies, UN agencies and others working to ensure the availability of effective, safe and affordable medicines for all.

More technical briefs

Continuing to ignore the problem of the know-how gap won’t make it go away.

The Covid-19 pandemic was a wake-up call for a variety of issues in access to medicines, one of which was finding a solution to...

The last mile: A few suggestions for the WHO Pandemic Agreement’s last two weeks of talks 

This technical briefing note is also available as a PDF here. On 16 April, the Bureau of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) to draft and...

European Parliament’s amendments make the Regulation for EU-wide compulsory licensing difficult to use and need to be rolled back

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2024, on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on compulsory...

The European Parliament has now explicitly acknowledged the know-how problem too: time to include a workable solution in the draft Pandemic Accord.

This technical briefing note is also available as a PDF here. We have been calling attention to the problem of sharing know-how necessary for the...

Related Articles

Will Europe block the Pandemic Agreement because of one word?

This commentary originally appeared in the Brussels Times, and is available here. The Pandemic Agreement negotiations began in December of 2021. Sufficiently motivated by the...

“Mutually agreed terms and conditions,” says it all.

On 4 March, Politico reported that the Polish presidency of the Council of the European Union (EU) is expressing doubt that the Pandemic Agreement...

“This week, the medicines were not there”: What is at stake in the pandemic agreement

Earlier this week I listened to a testimony from a community worker at a maternity ward where HIV-positive women gave birth. 17 babies were...

The world needs a signal that multilateralism works: ML&P opening statement to the INB13, 17 February 2025

Thank you for the opportunity to make a brief statement. The negotiations for the Pandemic Agreement enter the final phase. We hope and wish for...

Newsletter

Never miss a post! Sign up for ML&P's newsletter.

Recent Articles

Will Europe block the Pandemic Agreement because of one word?

This commentary originally appeared in the Brussels Times, and is available here. The Pandemic Agreement negotiations began in December of 2021. Sufficiently motivated by the...

“Mutually agreed terms and conditions,” says it all.

On 4 March, Politico reported that the Polish presidency of the Council of the European Union (EU) is expressing doubt that the Pandemic Agreement...

“This week, the medicines were not there”: What is at stake in the pandemic agreement

Earlier this week I listened to a testimony from a community worker at a maternity ward where HIV-positive women gave birth. 17 babies were...

A better way to solve a crisis: A new mechanism for incentivising R&D on new antimicrobials

Antimicrobial resistance is the ‘silent’ pandemic: Globally, it costs 5 million lives a year, and is set to rise to more than 8 million...

The world needs a signal that multilateralism works: ML&P opening statement to the INB13, 17 February 2025

Thank you for the opportunity to make a brief statement. The negotiations for the Pandemic Agreement enter the final phase. We hope and wish for...